Ants Vs Crabs – a surprising winner! – Ant Attack – BBC wildlife

18 October 2010 by admin, 25 Comments


2 Ants Vs Crabs a surprising winner! Ant Attack BBC wildlifeIncredible footage of ants overcoming and eating a crab – hard to believe but true! Brilliant clip from BBC show Ant Attack.

Duration : 0:3:25



Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

25 Responses to “Ants Vs Crabs – a surprising winner! – Ant Attack – BBC wildlife”

  1. TheWildbetta 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @joeman: I’m sorry. …
    @joeman: I’m sorry. In German it is spelled like that. So I switched back to German sometimes. Thank you for being attentive. But I guess that doesn’t ruin my argument, does it ? ; )

  2. joeman27213 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @TheWildbetta learn …
    @TheWildbetta learn to spell theory…

  3. TheWildbetta 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @IrllenQueiroz : …
    @IrllenQueiroz : You simply don’t know, what theory means in a scientific context, do you? Evolution has been proven, several times. The THEORIE OF EVOLUTION describes how that developement works. Theory of eclectricity, theory of gravity- got it? You can’t achieve more in science than a theorie. So, inform youself before you talk about things you don’t understand.

  4. IrllenQueiroz 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @TheWildbetta …
    @TheWildbetta Evolutionism is a theory..just that..not proved as fact! But accepted for some.

  5. azorian2 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    36 crabs watched …
    36 crabs watched this ^^

  6. ungface 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @shammyshity

    Its …
    @shammyshity

    Its called communism

  7. gwasDpk 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    You think this …
    You think this is hardcore, once I conditioned before I shampooed. Nuff said.

  8. 16OMGITZME 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    Ouch Poor Crab God …
    Ouch Poor Crab God If I Was The Crab I Would Have Started Snaping Like Crazy And Watch Out Where I Am Steping And Than Ran For The Nearest Water Spot To Drown The Ants Thats On Me :S

  9. CJalltheway1 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @shammyshity oh but …
    @shammyshity oh but you dont understand that is what religions are trying to do. think about it

  10. Yobidefy 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    Ants can rule the …
    Ants can rule the world anytime they want.. they’re small but terrible

  11. shammyshity 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    Ants are so …
    Ants are so victorious. If only humans can harness the power of unity like the ant.

  12. orikie 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @PrivetCyan ive …
    @PrivetCyan ive heard that ants can live like 2 weeks under water :P

  13. mertig100 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    0:58 want bug spray …
    0:58 want bug spray so bad

  14. Osher79 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @PrivetCyan u can’t …
    @PrivetCyan u can’t be near the water all the time……………

  15. ouinonyes 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    The ants as one is …
    The ants as one is not A SURPRISING WINNER!
    stupid

  16. ccgamemaster75 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    I HATE ANTS …
    I HATE ANTS, BUT THEY’RE SO SATISFYING TO KILL

  17. bluegama500 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @PrivetCyan There …
    @PrivetCyan There was no water around. It was in the bush/jungle.

  18. bluegama500 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    Poor crabs.
    Poor crabs.

  19. TheWildbetta 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    damn, is there any …
    damn, is there any video about nature left without any comments of a rediculous creationist?! How can anybody be stupid enough to not belive in a proven fact like evolution, but in an old farytail called “God” and “creation”??
    Greetings from Germany. valu777: You just don`t get it, do you?

    Btw: winning ants are not really surprising, are they?

  20. valu777 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @minborox sorry …
    @minborox sorry there is no observation and or proof of a common ancestor (post a link to a photo if this common ancestor if you can? or admit it is just a deceptive description of a fictional thing )
    again i state that evolution is simply not observed in nature the fossil record or any other record

  21. minborox 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @valu777
    Every …
    @valu777
    Every form in nature is a transitional form physiologically, since these are all observed forms of divergence from a common ancestor.
    eg. Chimps. eg. Algae coenocytes and chilorophyta colony cells.
    Gymnosperm transition to angiosperms, and their transitional forms in the middle.

    To make it more clear, there are also lots of these in the fossil record too, all laid in the sequence which they are meant to be dated to.

  22. valu777 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @minborox ( a …
    @minborox ( a transitional form problem) this is simply not witnessed in nature

  23. minborox 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @valu777
    Idiot…. …
    @valu777
    Idiot….
    All these structures are inherited from their previous ancestors.
    Your philosophy clearly has not prepared you for the fact that all these structures can be inherited from their previous ancestors?
    Even when these organisms change into another slightly different species, they leave clues that they are from that linage, from these common characteristics, such as vertebrates.
    This is called a transitional form.

  24. minborox 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @valu777
    WRONG. …
    @valu777
    WRONG. You have no Idea what natural selection is all about. Neither will you ever be convinced that new species have evolved right under our eyes. Some are even driven by human infrastructure, which are relatively recent constructions!
    I even asked you why the heck do you even bother bringing up your own theories that have no evidence, when you try to extract evidence from me?

    You FAIL!!!

  25. minborox 18 October 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    @valu777
    Do you …
    @valu777
    Do you want to see the 3 and 4 and 5 eyed fossils from the Cambrian period?
    They sure have a lot of transitional forms.


Leave a Reply